Vol. I · Spring '26
Performance & review

Reviews that produce decisions.

The annual performance review is the document a manager is read by. It sets the promotion case, the compensation conversation, the case-law of how the team operates. Done badly, it is the document a court reads later.

Five templates: the longer outcomes-and-behaviours review, a leaner annual variant, the 90-day new-hire check-in, a structured 30/60/90 PIP, and a year-round achievement tracker that feeds the review. Each is designed to produce a decision, not paperwork.

FAQ

Three questions worth settling first.

What cadence should I run reviews at?
Annual is standard; twice-yearly is increasingly common; quarterly check-ins as a lightweight overlay are good. The cadence matters less than whether the reviews actually produce decisions. A polished annual review that everyone ignores beats four lightweight reviews no one acts on.
Should reviews be rated?
Yes, where you can defend the rating against evidence. Numeric ratings on their own are cheap; ratings backed by specific examples are the document you can stand behind. Refuse to rate without examples.
What about 360-degree reviews?
Useful at senior levels and in coaching contexts; usually overkill for individual contributors. The achievement tracker can incorporate peer notes year-round without the heavy 360 machinery.