Writing a PIP for a people manager is different from writing one for an individual contributor. The performance includes their team's performance, the consequences affect everyone in the reporting line, and the credibility cost — to the manager and to the function — is higher. This page covers the methodology and a worked example.
What's on this page
A manager's individual contribution matters, but the primary measurement is the team. Delivery against roadmap, retention, engagement, hiring outcomes. The performance gap is often a team-outcome gap, not just an individual one.
Managers create their value through behaviors — feedback delivery, decision-making, advocacy, hiring judgment. These are harder to measure than artifacts. Manager PIPs require careful design of behavior indicators.
Demonstrating sustained team improvement takes longer than individual improvement. 90 days minimum, sometimes 120. The 60-day default for IC PIPs is rarely enough.
Three categories of measurement that translate management capability into observable indicators.
Delivery against roadmap commitments (% complete). Hiring outcomes (offers made / accepted / first-year retention). Customer or stakeholder satisfaction scores attributable to the team's work.
Team eNPS or engagement-survey score (baseline → target). Voluntary attrition rate during the plan period (vs company average). Specific feedback themes in pulse surveys (e.g., 'manager support' rating).
Feedback delivery cadence (each report receives N pieces of substantive feedback per month). 1:1 frequency and continuity (cancellation rate). Career-development conversations completed. Documentation quality for promotion or termination decisions.
Many manager PIPs include a demotion-to-IC option in the consequences. Worth offering only when three conditions are met.
When all three conditions are met, the IC option is genuinely kind. When any one isn't met, offering it is a face-saving gesture that costs the company time and the manager dignity. Be honest with yourself before including this in the plan.
Engineering manager, sustained delivery + retention issues, IC option in consequences. Names and specifics fictional.
The performance being evaluated includes the team's performance, not just individual output. Objectives should cover team outcomes (delivery, retention, engagement) alongside behaviors (feedback delivery, team development). Plan periods are usually longer — 90 days, sometimes 120 — because demonstrating sustained team improvement takes longer than individual improvement. And the consequences often include a demotion-to-IC option that doesn't exist for non-managers.
No. The PIP is between the company and the individual manager. Telling the team undermines the manager's authority during the plan period (sometimes irrecoverably). The team may notice changes — more skip-level conversations, the manager attending coaching, schedule shifts — but the document and its terms stay confidential. If the manager wants to disclose anything to the team, that's their choice.
Yes — and they should, especially if 'feedback delivery' is one of the PIP concerns. The PIP is a private accountability mechanism; the manager's regular responsibilities continue. Suspending feedback during the PIP would undermine the team and make the plan's measurement (was feedback actually delivered?) impossible.
Treat with care. The PIP creates pressure that may surface either genuine new concerns or retaliation from team members who've heard rumors. The skip-level should evaluate whether new feedback represents independent concerns or echoes of existing ones. New, substantive concerns may justify ending the plan early; rumors and noise should not.
Only when (a) the manager's individual contribution remains strong, (b) there's an actual IC role available and a budget for it, and (c) the manager would be a credible IC after stepping back from management. Offering it as a face-saving exit when no real path exists is dishonest and often results in the manager leaving in a worse state than a clean termination.
A note when new HR templates ship. A quarterly summary of US and AU employment-law changes. No more than four emails a year.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime — every email has a one-click unsubscribe link.